Happy Friday {{first_name}}!! If you are looking for an associate role with a great growing company, send a message to: Dr. Caleb as they are looking for another rehab chiro in the the Houston, Tx area.
This publication is sponsored by The Athlete Spot™ . Where rehab meets performance.
The Case
K is 26. Road runner, five consistent years, two marathons and a stack of halves, eleven weeks into a spring build when the shin started talking. She walked into my office holding a piece of paper like it was a boarding pass — a clearance note from her sports medicine physician, written seven weeks after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed a bone stress injury in the posteromedial distal third of her left tibia. Three words on it. Cleared to run.
Then she asked me what day she could do her long run.
That question is the whole issue.
The Trap
Treating medical clearance as a return-to-run program. And this one is not carelessness. The physician's job was to determine whether the bone had healed enough to tolerate loading, and she did that job correctly — the note is an accurate answer to the question she was asked. The failure is downstream. The athlete reads "cleared" as a start line, the clinician reads it as a discharge, and nobody owns the six weeks in between. K was going to go run 40 miles a week because nobody gave her anything else to do and the note did not say not to. Then the second trap: when the shin aches again at week three, that ache gets relabeled as medial tibial stress syndrome, or tightness, or just getting back into it. She gets a calf stretch and permission to keep running, and a bone that was two thirds healed goes back the other direction.
The Workup
Focal bony tenderness, posteromedial tibial border — negative. I pressed hard along the full length twice and got nothing. This is the first gate. Persistent focal bony tenderness is the single most consistent reason to hold a runner out, and its absence is required before any running is reintroduced. Present, and the conversation is over before it starts.
Pain-free walking tolerance — negative for symptoms. Thirty minutes of brisk walking, no pain during, no pain the next morning. Walking is the lowest-magnitude dose that still counts as cyclic bone loading. If 30 minutes of it provokes next-day symptoms, the tissue is nowhere near the roughly threefold load that running represents. This was her first real green light in the entire exam.
Tibial fulcrum test and single-leg hop — negative for pain, positive for performance deficit. No focal pain on either, which clears her for loading. But reduced hop height and visible hesitation on the left tell you she is not ready for running volume. Those are two separate findings from one test, and clinicians collapse them into one answer constantly.
Single-leg heel raise endurance — positive for deficit. The left calf failed well before the right with an early drop in heel height. The soleus is the primary attenuator of tibial loading during running, so a weak soleus transfers load the muscle should have absorbed into the bone that just failed. This is the highest-yield modifiable finding in the exam. Her single-leg squat added a frontal plane control deficit by the sixth repetition — and a deficit that shows up at rep six shows up at mile six.
Contributing-factor screen — positive, and nobody had run it. Her cycle became irregular eight months ago and stopped entirely four months ago. She trains fasted in the morning, which is her longest weekday session. No bone density scan, no vitamin D level, ever. Seven weeks of care and not one person had asked.
The discriminator: CLEARED answers one question — has the bone healed. READY answers a different one — how much running, on what schedule, with what underneath it. K is cleared of a fracture. She is not ready to run. And site decides how much that distinction forgives you: a posteromedial tibia is a low-risk, compressive, forgiving environment, which is the only reason this is a conversation about weeks. An anterior mid-tibia, femoral neck, navicular, or medial malleolus cannot be cleared on clinical criteria alone, full stop.
Now, are you following? Absence of pain is not evidence of readiness. Symptoms lag the tissue, and bone density in both legs keeps falling for months after a unilateral injury.
The Plan
Foundation: Soleus-biased calf loading with the knee bent, because that is the tissue that spares the tibia, chasing symmetry with the uninvolved side before anything else happens. Add frontal plane control work off the squat finding, loading-tolerance isometrics without impact, and cross-training that keeps her aerobic engine alive without asking the bone for anything.
Loading: A graded walk-run progression on flat, level ground, alternating days only — bone remodels on the rest day, not the run day. Distance before speed, and never both in the same week. Nudge her cadence up for the whole phase, because per-step loading magnitude is precisely the variable that needs reducing while a tibia rebuilds mechanical competence.
Sport-specific: Continuous running first, then volume at no more than 10 percent per week, then terrain. Hills come back last because hills were part of the original workload error. Speed waits until four consecutive pain-free weeks at rising volume. Heavy calf work stays in the program indefinitely — not for six weeks, indefinitely.
The whole thing runs on the 24-hour rule, and you write it down at visit one. Symptoms during a session stop the session. Symptoms the next morning cancel the next session and repeat the previous step. You do not skip forward. Return of focal bony tenderness at any point stops the program and triggers a referral.
Clinical pearl: A fingertip points to bone and a flat hand points to soft tissue — ask the runner to show you where it hurts and watch which one they use before you touch anything.
Earn Your CE
Read the full article in your membership hub, take the quiz, get 1 PACE CE hour.
We track the rest.
Not a member yet? Enjoying what you read? Then join and earn your CE’s.
The Practice
The Performance Doctor: Three things in this case protect the practice, and none of them are an exercise.
The first is how you handle a clearance note you did not write. K arrived holding a physician's document saying she could run, and I told her not to run yet. That tension deserves care, not confidence. The resolution is in the framing: I am not contradicting the finding. The bone has healed and I agree it has healed. I am answering a different question: how much running and on what schedule. And that question was never inside the scope of the note. I said it that way to K, then called the physician's office and said the same thing. Nobody was overruled and everybody stayed informed. That phone call is also how you become the clinician that office refers to next.
The second is the question nobody wants to ask. Four months without a period in a runner with a bone stress injury is a finding, not a side note, and it gets skipped because it feels invasive or like somebody else's job. It belongs to whoever notices it. You do not diagnose it or manage it — you name what you found, explain plainly why it matters to bone, and make the referral. K was not offended. She was surprised nobody had asked in seven weeks. And screen fueling in everybody, because male runners get the same injury from the same mechanism and there is no missed period to prompt the question. A clinic that only evaluates gait is structurally incapable of identifying the athletes most likely to break again.
The third is the money conversation, said out loud. A twelve-week progressive loading program costs more than a four-visit discharge, and K had already paid for a marathon she was about to miss. Both facts create pressure to compress the timeline, and some of that pressure comes from our side of the table whether we admit it or not. The honest position is to separate what she needs from what she can afford, tell her both, and build the version that works for her. She needed a structured progression and periodic reassessment. She did not need twelve in-office visits. So we built a home program with four checkpoints, and I told her the race entry was already spent money and the tibia was not.
Ask about the cycle. Test the calf. Write the progression down and give them a copy. Two runners with identical MRIs can need completely different programs, because every patient is unique.
We are moving our website! www.smartcareeducation.com will be down temporarily from Nov 19th - December 19th as we move to our new host. Thank you for your patience as we partake in this transition.
Every patient is unique. The framework tells you where to look. Your hands and your questions tell you what you found.
In health and strength,
Hunting has taught me more about patience, than raising a newborn.
Dr. Thomas Kauffman, DC, CDNP, CSCS, USAW
The Clinical Coach™ a SmartCARE Education™ publication
The Clinical Coach™ is a clinical education publication produced by SmartCARE Education™. Content is for educational purposes and CE credit. Always exercise independent clinical judgment with individual patients.
If you have any questions, or any feedback, reply to this email. I read every response.